在歷史學裡，沒有所謂真實的歷史，因為閱者所讀乃書者所聞。十九世紀後的史學,重
證據、重科學；史家們企圖收集許多歷史片段，重現所謂的「真相」。然而，何謂真相，何謂事實。現代歷史學家大部分都同意一件事，沒有所謂「真正歷史」和真
正的「真相」，因為史家們只能呈現一部分的歷史，而非真正的全貌。人們所相信的真相也是如此；相對地，扭曲得十分嚴重，因為－人類只會把想看到的東西，當作是真相；不想聽到的東西，則全都是謊言。諷刺的說，只要說出人們想聽的話，就能夠輕易操縱人群.
所以在某一層面來說， 「真相」只在人的腦袋中！而非真實的存在!
In
the historical study, the true history cannot be revealed because what
people read is from what the historian writes. Since 19 century, the
historical research has emphasised on the evidence and the scientific
approach. The historians try to collect historical chips in order to
reappear to the true history. However, what is the truth? What is the
real history? The modern historians mostly agree that there is no “real”
history or “truth” because they can only represent some parts of the
history, not the holistic history. The truth what people believe is the
common. Further, the “truth” people believe might misinterpret and
misrepresent relatively because people only believe what they seek. On the other hand, the lie what people identify is what people dislike. Ironically, if some one can voice what people like and desire, people might be controlled and misled.
As the truth, it is only in the human mind, not the real existence!
沒有留言:
張貼留言